Vault Template Updates: Simpler Writing, Clearer Thinking
The latest template redesign strips away complexity to help you focus on what matters: writing, reflecting, and moving forward.
If you’ve ever opened a fresh daily note and felt overwhelmed by a wall of prompts—sections to fill, boxes to check, categories to organize—this update is for you.
The new Sidian Vault templates are intentionally minimal. They’re designed around a simple principle: the template should get out of your way so you can start writing.
Here’s what changed, why, and how it makes journaling more enjoyable.
The problem with comprehensive templates
Templates promise structure. But too often, structure becomes a barrier:
- You stare at 12 empty sections, unsure where to begin
- You skip the prompts you don’t have energy for, then feel guilty
- You spend more time formatting than thinking
- The template feels like homework, not a thinking tool
The old templates weren’t “wrong”—they were thorough. But thoroughness has a cost: friction.
What changed: simpler by default, deeper when needed
The new system has two tiers:
Simple templates for daily writing
The daily note template is now just three sections:
# {{date:YYYY-MM-DD}}
## Daily Focus
- [ ]
- [ ]
- [ ]
## Log
## Links
- [[Related goal]]
- [[Relevant topic]]
That’s it. Three focus items. A freeform log. A place to link what matters.
The weekly template follows the same philosophy:
# Week ## (YYYY-MM-DD to YYYY-MM-DD)
## Weekly Focus
- [ ]
- [ ]
- [ ]
## Weekly Plan
- [ ]
- [ ]
- [ ]
## Log
No hourly breakdowns. No mood tracking. No complex categorization. Just enough structure to guide your thinking without constraining it.
Long templates for deeper work
When you do want more depth—for quarterly planning, a detailed goal, or a monthly review—the “long” versions are there:
tm_goal_long.md— Full goal definition with success criteria, constraints, and kill criteriatm_monthly_review_long.md— Comprehensive review with Stop/Start/Continue analysistm_quarterly_strategy_long.md— Strategic planning with assumptions, leading indicators, and invalidation triggers
The point isn’t to avoid depth. It’s to make depth optional, not mandatory.
New thinking tools: Six Hats and SWOT
Two new brainstorming templates help when you’re stuck on a decision or exploring an idea:
Six Thinking Hats (tm_brainstorm_6_thinking_hats.md) walks you through:
- White Hat: Facts
- Red Hat: Feelings and intuition
- Black Hat: Risks
- Yellow Hat: Benefits
- Green Hat: New ideas
- Blue Hat: Process and decision
SWOT Analysis (tm_swot_analysis.md) gives you a classic framework for:
- Strengths
- Weaknesses
- Opportunities
- Threats
These aren’t for daily use. They’re for when you’re wrestling with something that needs structure.
Stronger goal definition with built-in discipline
The new goal template borrows from product management thinking:
# [Goal Name]
## Status
- **State**: On track / At risk / Off track / Done / Dropped
- **Confidence (1-5)**:
- **Owner**:
## Success Criteria
- [Criterion 1]
- [Criterion 2]
## Constraints
- [Constraint 1]
## Non-Goals
- [What this goal is not trying to do]
## Kill Criteria
- [Condition that triggers a pivot/pause]
This structure forces clarity:
- Success Criteria — How will you know when you’re done?
- Non-Goals — What are you explicitly not doing? (Prevents scope creep)
- Kill Criteria — What would make you abandon this goal? (Prevents sunk cost fallacy)
Goals without boundaries become wishes. This template turns wishes into decisions.
Better monthly reviews with carry-over decisions
The monthly review now includes a “Carry-over decision” column:
| Goal | State | Confidence | Progress | Carry-over decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [[Goal 1]] | On track | 4 | [Brief update] | Continue/Pause/Drop |
This forces a monthly choice: Should this goal continue?
No more goals that quietly fade away without a decision. No more zombie goals that you’re “technically still working on.”
The review also adds:
- Stop / Start / Continue — A simple framework for behavior change
- Top 3 Commitments — What are you actually promising for next month?
Quarterly strategy with assumptions and indicators
The quarterly template now asks better questions:
## Assumptions
- [Assumption 1]
- [Assumption 2]
## Leading Indicators (Progress)
- [Indicator 1]
## Lagging Indicators (Outcomes)
- [Indicator 1]
## Invalidation Triggers
- [Signal that requires a pivot]
This is the difference between “I want to get fit” and “I’m assuming I can exercise 4x/week. If I miss 3 weeks in a row, I need a different approach.”
Leading indicators tell you if you’re on track before the results show up. Invalidation triggers give you permission to change course.
Folder structure changes
A few organizational updates:
02_Diary/is now01_Journal/— Clearer naming, and it sorts first05_Projects/now hasBacklog/andArchive/subfolders — Match the goal lifecycle- Planning is numbered (
1_Weekly/,2_Monthly/,3_Quarterly/) — Easier to navigate
Why this makes writing more enjoyable
The new templates reduce friction in three ways:
- Lower activation energy — Open a daily note and you see 3 checkboxes, not 12 prompts
- Optional depth — Use the long version when you need it, not every day
- Clearer decisions — Status, confidence, and kill criteria make choices explicit
When the barrier to starting is lower, you write more. When you write more, patterns emerge. When patterns emerge, you learn things about yourself that you couldn’t see in the moment.
That’s the whole point of journaling—not to produce beautiful notes, but to understand your own thinking.
Getting the updates
If you’re using the Sidian Vault template, pull the latest changes or download the template fresh.
If you’re new, the Guide.md file has complete documentation for the entire system—including the updated templates, folder structure, and workflows.
The best system is the one you actually use. These updates are designed to make the vault something you want to open, not something you have to maintain.